Saturday, April 28, 2012

http://thebuffster.tumblr.com/


I'm a Buffy psychofan and so I follow up about 3 Buffy blog religiously. Came upon this and thought it related a lot to the appeal of online fandom. That sense of community and belonging where it is based on something you and complete, total strangers have a common love for. A something that would render you strange, weird and uncool in Real Life.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Fandemonium. A title and question in the works.

The society, culture and universe of fandoms and what it does to their inhabitants/civilians/followers/fans/people

The investigation on the world/society/culture/community of television fandom, fan activities and it's impact/influence/implications on a fan's personal identity. 


Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Say hello to my opening quote for my introduction:

The first 14 seconds.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/nr3qwB7ORL8

For those of you too lazy to actually watch that, this is the gist of what I'm putting in:

Leonard:
"Hey Sheldon, clear your weekend. Starting Saturday morning, Star Wars marathon."

Sheldon:
"Movies or video games? No, board games, or trading card games or legos or dress up or comic books or dramatic readings of novelisations? YES TO ALL."

All content and material from Big Bang Theory belong to CBS and Warner Bros.

List of Fandoms

I initially wanted to focus on two specific fandoms, one television series and one film series. I talked to teacher about it and we've decided to just go with television fandom in general so now I have a lot to work with. Here is a list that shall accumulate as days past. I'll find a list widget somewhere for this blog. I'll stick to science fiction and fantasy genres.

  • Joss Whedon-verse:
    Buffy the Vampire Slayer
    Angel
    Firefly
    Dollhouse
    Dr Horrible
  • True Blood
  • Vampire Diaries
  • Doctor Who
  • Star Trek
  • Game of Thrones
  • Supernatural
  • Sherlock

What I got from that

So previous post was just notes. What I got from that was the historical to the present studies on fandoms and how it has evolved. Pretty much, fandom power and authority has dramatically increased along with the technology as it connects people all over the world who share the same love for the same series. It also allows the fans to contact the actual production, actors and all others affiliated with the fandom. It opened the doors to an infinite amount of possibilities to different ways for fan activites. You can now share your fanfiction, fan art, fan videos, conspiracies, thoughts and desires with the rest of the world.

Fandom itself is the result of popular culture which can range from music to literary works. I want to focus on televsion and film franchises. It has evolved into a prominent subculture and even a whole different society that gains more and more followers everyday. They have their own language (fanspeak e.g. shipping is supporting two fictional characters romantic relationship), their own subtle and (un)spoken/written rules of fandom society (dress codes for conventions, heirarchy), places of gathering (both physical and virtual. Online forums, fansites, real life conventions etc.) and their own forms of literature and art (fanfics, fanart, fanvids, fanmusic/filk)

Basically "fandomism" is people developing a strong bond or connection to original popular culture material and wanting to take that franchise out of the realm of fantasy and fiction and manifesting it in reality through their active participation in fandoms. Through connecting with others who share this love and need, they begin to gather and mass and create a whole community. This is made easy especially through the internet.

Here's a little thing I came up with:
  1. Obsession with a fandom ->
  2. Obsession with a fictional character ->
  3. To obsession with the actor who plays or embodies that character ->
  4. To obsession with trying to find what other works they have done ->
  5. Obsession with another film/ televsion show that actor has worked in ->
  6. Obsession with new character(s) in that show ->
  7. Obsession with the actor who plays that character ->
  8. and so on and so forth.

e.g.

  1. Obsessed with the novel and film Hunger Games ->
  2. Obsession with the main protagonist, Katniss Everdeen ->
  3. Obsession with Jennifer Lawrence who played that character in the film ->
  4. Look into what other films or shows she has done; the most popular one being X-Men:First Class ->
  5. Become obsessed with the character Erik/Magneto ->
  6. Obsession with Michael Fassbender who plays that character ->
  7. His other prominent films include Jane Eyre, Inglorious Basterds and Prometheus >
  8. Become obsessed with one of those and the process begins again.
It's a vicious cycle of fandom.

Now what I have to do is figure out how all of this influences and impacts on a personal identity(micro level) and/or the media culture (network production, actors etc. This is macro level)

The Communication of Fan Culture: The Impact of New Media on Science Fiction and Fantasy Fandom

By Betsy Gooch of the Georgia Institute of Technology

THE FIRST TWELVE PAGES

Probably the best site to help me start. I've gotten through 10 pages or more and have already WRITTEN, in my dusty logbook, 7 pages worth of notes about this. 4 of those pages are my own thoughts and gatherings about fandom and rough drafts of possible questions and ventures I should persue. 3 of those pages are completely filled with notes from this thesis.

Basically what I've gotten from the first 12 pages is what fandom is, what it involves and how it has evolved. There have been three generations of study: 1950s-1980s: the beginning of scholary investigation on fandoms, 1990-1999: media fans, 2000 to present: cyberfandom. However even the concept of fandom predates all of this. Nevertheless, the thesis gives me great information about what each generation entails and includes great examples of fandoms and prominent scholars for each era.

1950s-1980s:
Literary works, fanzines (unofficial fan magazines)

  • Harry Warner Jr.
    Fandom historian and a fan himself. Noted the increasing of the blurred lines and crossover between science fiction and fantasy genres
1990-1999
More visual texts: film, television, comics/graphic novels. Media fans/mediafen who are starting to "shape the face of science fiction and fantasy on television through their dedication and inspiring love for the show and genre." Crossing over from just a personal hobby and obsession into the realm of reality and production (large scale fan campaigns and support)

  • Forest Ackerman
    Coined term: sci-fi. Devoted fan turned professional writer and editor, investigated the progression of sci-fi as a genre in literature, film and TV
  • John Tulloch
    Explains the relationship between producers and the audience. Investigates growing influence, power and authority of fans on the production of siginifcant shows (Doctor Who, Star Trek). This has grown more evident with the developement of techonology and communication
  • Camille Bacon-Smith
    Talks about the fan community and the growing amount and influence of female fans (fanfiction helping them play out their fantasies and desires)
2000-Present
Cyberfandom, emphasis on the role of the internet for both the fans and how fandom operates.

  • Henry Jenkins
    Explains relationship between fans with the television and film productions with the media culture (Production compant/actors etc.).
    "Textual Poachers": the emergence of ratists and authors who taker original material and create their own texts. This is said with affection though - in a positive light.
    "Fandom: a community of hardworking authors and artists trying to become closer to their favourite stories, films, television via reproduction."
    Significant emphasis on the growth in participatory nature of fandom.

Fan culture studies can further be divided into 3 areas of research:
  • The historical documentation of individual fandoms
  • Exploration of the cultural reasoning for and issues that occur due to fan activites
  • The analysis of fan productions as cultural artifacts.

  • (historical aspect of fandom -> consumer analysis of fan culture -> culture research on reasons behind fan productions)
Most of the notes I've just typed up are direct quotes from the thesis. I just summarised so that it can be understood more easily in layman terms. For more in depth information and a general great, geeky read, click this link or just the title for the full thesis. I don't claim to own any of this material or ideas.

Monday, April 23, 2012

Driven by desperation and improvisation

So since I got a new topic last Friday, I've now got to write 1000 words for my first chapter by this Friday. Since my mac is having technical difficulties, I have resorted to my 8 year old PC in order to document my research and findings on blog and also to use my 2007 Microsoft word and Internet Explorer. Only a true young Gen Y and geek would find this stuff ancient.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

So...Tutorial #2

Well technically happened yesterday. It was the last Friday of the holidays and Miss set up two days to helps us out with our writing and see how our PIPs wer getting along. Of course I did some semblance of research and work these holidays but nothing that set me off or got me into it. So after my first one on one with the teacher, I was left with a drab thesis and procrastinating time to mull over what I was really doing.

Later on I got fed up and just thought to myself, 'You know what? Screw it" and asked to have a chat with teacher.

I had this thing in my head for a while. On Thursday I watched Battleship with a couple of friends (mixed feelings about that film...) and afterwards we killed time by looking around JB HI FI.

We got to the TV section.

Now, this section is pretty broad. It's categorised by the television network and/or by genre. I noticed that for every single section we got to, we all had something to say for about at least 3 different shows. I mentioned the show Merlin and was surprised that at least one other friend followed that series and was obsessed with the same aspects as I did. We got into Doctor Who, Mad Men, True Blood, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Game of Thrones, Sherlock and that wa just he tip of the iceberg. We watched A LOT of tv. Out of all this, I noticed how much passion we had for certain franchises as well, not just tv shows but films and literature as well.

I brought this up with teacher and got into this idea that had been nagging me for a little while. Fandoms. Now, I know when it come to TV shows, I tend to get geeky and obsessive. What I love is that not only can I share this with my friends who are also avid viewers, but I could also share this with the global community. I check certain tumblrs hourly, when I can, to see the latest gif photoset based on Sherlock or Hunger Games or Buffy the Vampire Slayer. They seem to know exactly how I feel about certain aspects of the franchise.

One of my guilty pleasures since Year 7 or 8 is fanfiction. I read fanfiction almost daily. Mainly Sailor Moon, Buffy and yes, even Twilight fanfiction. I realized that through my obsessons with these films, tv shows and books, that I go to great and almost ridiculous lengths to keep this obsession alive and healthy and that I'm certainly not alone.

This quickly became a topic of interest once I tried to explain this to teacher. I began my research and found a couple of really good thesis' already. I'm not going to get into that on this post though.

I bottom line is, I've changed topic. As much as I love the dark, tall, handsome and brutally gorgeous brooding men, I want to go in this direction (early rough question):

How does fandom move individuals beyond the realm of popular culture and what influences do fandom communities have on the personal identity of fans?

Taking a franchise out of the realm of fantasy and fiction and manifesting it into reality through active participation in fandoms (cyber and physical communities) and how it effects the personal identity.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Jon Kortajarena - The Pilot

So I sort of piloted a section of my survey. I Facebook asked Mila to help judge the images from the Jon Kortajarena post I did. Here's how it went (copy and pasted Facebook Chat messages and edited to keep this short, not to exclude information)

Me: Ok so I''m going to send you a link with pictures of the same guy. I need you to tell me what emotion/vibe you get from him, rate each picture out of 10 (10 being best) and tell me which one you like best
 
 
Mila: What do you want me to say about vibe? Like the emotion he makes me feel or how he feels?
 
 
Me Both :D
Mila: I give the first one a 9 and I think he feels like excited and he makes me feel his adorableness seeping through the photo.
 
 
The second one 7 and it's just sexy. Or like suggestive of something more.


The third one I think 8 cause he looks intrigued and it makes me like him cause he looks nerdy and cute and is reading and I like that.
 
 
The next one 10 cause it makes him look approachable and nice and I like it alot better when he's smiling and being natural then when he's all brooding.
The last one an 9 too cause I dunno it makes him look vulnerable and like he needs and hug and it makes me wanna give him a hug and be nice and have a nice deep conversation.
 
 
So I found this very helpful and interesting especially from all my research pointing out that women are more physically attracted to cocky or brooding guys.
 
 
The first image, I classified as the cocky/confident image. She gave it a 9, got excited and loved his "adorableness"
Second image, I classified as the angry/intense/brooding image. She gave it a 7, calling it "sexy" and "suggestive"
Third image, I classified as semi-brooding/thoughtful image. She gave that one an 8 saying that his thoughtful expression and that the newpaper reading was a nice "nerdy" touch.
Fourth image, I classfied as the happy/cheerful/smiling picture.This got her highest rating of 10. The smile made his "approachable" and "natural". I liked it in particular when she said:
"I like it alot better when he's smiling and being natural then when he's all brooding."
Fifth image, I classified it as the more sad/pensive/melancholy-type of brooding than number 2 and 3. The vulnerability of the image appealed to her maternal-like instincts, to try and help and comfort him. A sense of sort of approachableness comes through as she felt they could "have a nice deep conversation."
Overall, very helpful and hopefully I can clean up and distribute the survey by tomorrow night.

Picture Survey

Thinking about doing a survey. Here is how it would go. The first few questions would be based on franchises and fandoms. E.g. First question would be:

Out of these characters from the television series Gossip Girl, who would you choose and why?
a) Dan Humphries, (Penn Badgely)
Why_________________________
*insert image of the character*

b) Nate Archibald, (Chace Crawford)
Why_________________________
*insert image of the character*

c) Chuck Bass, (Ed Westwick)
Why_________________________
*insert image of the character*

Then later on the questions would go, "Which image do you like better and why?" Following would be images of a random male model but each image his face is displaying different emotions: Happy/cheerful, angry/brooding/sad/pensive, cocky/confident/relaxed.

e.g (post below)

Jon Kortajarena - EXPERIMENT RANDOM

**EDIT NOTE** I have posted these images in relation to the next two posts. I sent this link to a friend to ask her a couple of questions about it. I asked her to give me the emotion she think's the model is trying to convey andwhat she feels when she looks at each of them, then rate them out of 10 (10 being the best) and which one she likes best and why.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Do Nice Guys Lose and Bad Boys Win?

I love this site. It inspired the previous post. Brought a lot of characters from past eras up which helped. I mainly love it because it led to a page about the "Byronic Hero". It talks about how the bad boy image was created in the 1900s by the notorious poet Lord Byron. It then proceeds to list examples from the past (Shakepeare era) to present (I love how they list characters and then just name the actor Alan Rickman as if the man himself was to just a natural brooder and just gets the roles).

Good finds. As soon I look into this more and try to find a few more things, I'll get right into the primary.

Do Nice Guys Lose and Bad Boys Win?
http://enlightenedwomen.org/do-nice-guys-lose-bad-boys-win/

Monday, April 16, 2012

Semi-panicking because my school e-mail is not working. My myclasses is but mymail isn't. I NEED MY TEACHER COMMUNICATION AND MORAL SUPPORT. WISDOM IS BEING BLOCKED FROM ME THIS VERY INSTANT.

Ok. crap.

Friday, April 13, 2012

The Evolution of the Bad Boy

When I say bad boy, I think of the 50s with the emergence of Elvis and James Dean. Leather jackets, motorbikes (even though James Dean was never seen near a motorbike in any of his films. FACT.), smoking. Rough around the edges, rebels without causes, smart ass, talks back.

All signs of douchery yet for some reason, sooooooooo totally hot. But why is this? What is it about them that makes them so appealing? Is this healthy, or right, even?

And the fact of the matter is, the bad boy image began waaaaaaaaaay before the 1950s. It can be seen in Austen and Bronte literature with broody Darcy and Heathcliff. Heck, there was most probably some broody bad boys in Shakespeare.

I think, like fashion, there are different types of bad boys and they trend in a little cycle. They branch off from mysterious bad boy to brooding bad boy to rebel bad boy etc. Right now brooding bad boy is in.

Vampires are obviously everywhere and they are the epitome of brooding bad boys. They are immortal, beautiful monsters who regret or revel in their life of killing over the years. The vampire male leads in most of the shows and movies we see today mainly spend their time hunting animals instead of humans because they try to cling on to their humanity as they mourn the loss of their soul and the horrendous murders they've done in the previous decades or centuries. And since they were "turned" in the 1800s and even before that, they have those gentlemanly quality that pays homage to the original brooders from Austen/Bronte eras.

Before that was the "rebel-without-a-cause" bad boys who defied the rules just to spite authority and broke the rules because they were bored. The boys the dads warned you about who were up to no good and would be a bad influence on their little girls. Famous examples = James Dean, Bender from The Breakfast Club (<3), Danny from Grease.

There's probably more branches. I don't know exactly where this post is going, what point it's trying to prove or what I'm trying to say. But it all kind of sounds important to me so I'll just write it down in case.

"Dude watching with the Brontes"


I love this. It's pretty self explanitory. Basically parodising the two of the Bronte sisters "man-hunting" for their husband and liking the brooding ones which many of their lead male characters represent (Heathcliff anyone?) While the other sister just sees them as jackass jerks who are annoyingly rude.