Thursday, July 12, 2012

Michel de Certeau part 1: the Wiki-Nutshell

Referenced by many many fan scholars. Michel de Certeau


The Practice of Everyday Life is a book by Michel de Certeau which examines the ways in which people individualise mass culture, altering things, from utilitarian objects to street plans to rituals, laws and language, in order to make them their own. It was originally published in French as L'invention du quotidien. Vol. 1, Arts de faire' (1980). The 1984 English translation is by Steven Rendall. The book is one of the key texts in the study of everyday life.
The Practice of Everyday Life re-examines related fragments and theories from Kant and Wittgenstein to BourdieuFoucault and Détienne, in the light of a proposed theoretical model. Some consider it as being enormously influential in pushing cultural studies away from producer/product to the consumer.

To date, Certeau's most well-known and influential work in the United States has been The Practice of Everyday Life. In it, he combined his disparate scholarly interests to develop a theory of the productive and consumptive activity inherent in everyday life. According to Certeau, everyday life is distinctive from other practices of daily existence because it is repetitive and unconscious. In this context, Certeau’s study of everyday life is neither the study of “popular culture”, nor is it necessarily the study of everyday resistances to regimes of power. Instead, Certeau attempts to outline the way individuals unconsciously navigate everything from city streets to literary texts.
Perhaps the most influential aspect of The Practice of Everyday Life has emerged from scholarly interest in Certeau’s distinction between the concepts of strategy and tactics. Certeau links "strategies" with institutions and structures of power who are the "producers", while individuals are "consumers" acting in environments defined by strategies by using "tactics". In the influential chapter "Walking in the City", Certeau asserts that "the city" is generated by the strategies of governments, corporations, and other institutional bodies who produce things like maps that describe the city as a unified whole. Certeau uses the vantage from the World Trade Center in New York to illustrate the idea of a synoptic, unified view. By contrast, the walker at street level moves in ways that are tactical and never fully determined by the plans of organizing bodies, taking shortcuts in spite of the strategic grid of the streets. This concretely illustrates Certeau's argument that everyday life works by a process of poaching on the territory of others, using the rules and products that already exist in culture in a way that is influenced, but never wholly determined, by those rules and products.

***Yeah I know Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, apart from the fact that it can be, I'm just trying to get the general gist and understanding of his theories so that I can see why and how fan scholars have related it to fans and fandom community. ***





Fandom: Identities & Communities in a Mediated World

edited by Johnathan Gray, Cornel Sandvoss and C.Lee Harrington
afterword by Henry Jenkins
New York University Press, 2007

"Most people are fans of something. If not, they are bound to now someone who is...fandom matters because it matters to those who are fans. However beyond this, the contributions fan studies have made varied in the course of what we, in retrospect, can summarise as three generations of fan scholarship over the past two decades."

First wave: power, inequality, discrimination

  • de Certeau's theory (1984)
  • John Fiske - fans are "associated with the cultural tastes of subordinated formations of the people, particularly those disempowered by any combination of gender, age, class and race"
  • Bi-polar struggle between hegemonic culture industries and fans
  • FANS IN MAINSTREAM
  • Era of broadcasting changed to narrowcasting (niche marketing, target marketing; dissemination of information to narrow audience, no general public. Includes television and radio. Aiming media messages at specific segments of the public defined by the values, preferences o demographic attitudes)
  • Deregulation of media markets and reflected rise of new technologies, the fan as a specialised yet dedicated consumer has become centrepiece of media industries' marketing strategies. Rather than ridicule, fan audiences are now wooed and championed by cultural industries. 
  • Mainstream appreciation of being a fan
  • Changing representation of fans in mass media
  • Became more than mere act of being a fan of something, it was a collaborative strategy, a communal effort to form interpretive communities
  • Fan studies: negative protrayal/imagery/stereotype of fans by authorities, media and other non-fans. Low on social/cultural hierarchy
  • Tactics of fan audiences in their evasion of dominant ideologies
  • Camille Bacon-Smith, Henry Jenkins, Roberta Pearson, Constance Penly, John Tulloch
Second wave:
  • Leitmotif in the sociology of consumption by PIERRE BOURDEIU
  • Replication of social, cultural hierarchies within fan - and subcultures, as the choice of fan objects and fan practices of fan consumption are structured through out habitus as a reflection and further manifestation of our social, cultural and economic capital
  • Interpretive communities of fandom (as well as individual acts of fan consumption) embedded in the existing economical, social and cultural status quo. 
  • Gender, the taste hierarchies among fans themselves are described as the continuation of wider social inequalities. 
  • Conceptual shift of fan studies to fans seen as not a counterforce to existing social hierarchies and structures but, in sharp contrast, as agents of maintaining social and cultural systems of classification and this existing hierarchies
  • Bourdieuvian perspective to unmask false notion of popular culture as a realm of emancipation

  • 1&2 wave = focus of particular audience groups: fan communities, subcultures, interaction between members of such group either as interpretive and support networks, on in terms of cultural hierarchization and discrimination through distinction. Focus primarily on only one, possible the smallest subset of fan groups on wide spectrum spanning regular, emotionally uninvolved audience member to petty producers. 
3rd wave:
  • Increasingly diverse in conceptual, theoretical and methodological terms. 
  • Fans = common mode of consumption
  • Cyberfandom (online) is the shift/migration to the internet for fans and fandom. Specialised sites for specific fandoms, congregational sites for multiple fandoms in one (Television Without Pity; TWoP), accessible via Blackberries, iPods/iPhones, PUPs, laptops and cell phones
  • Off the web: celebrity, television and film gossip magazines, entertainment programs on television for people who want latest news and updates (cable, radio, satellite channels)
  • Chnging communication technologies and media texts contribute to and reflect increasing entrenchment of fan consumption in structure of our everyday life
  • MICRO = fan, intrapersonal, pleasures & motivations, relationship between fans and fan objects
  • MACRO = readings, tastes and practices are tied to wider social structures yet extends the conceptual focus beyond questioning of the hegemony and class to the dearching social, cultural and economic transformations of our time. (dialect between global and local; rise of spectacle and performance in fan consumption)
  • Fan patterns, behaviour, types of consumption and interaction are becoming more integrated/integral in every day life in modern societies (global phenomenon)
  • Sybiosis: cultural practice and perspective of being a fan + industrial modernity at large
  • Fan studies = key mechanisms through which we interact with the mediated world at the heart of our social, political and cultural realities and identities. 


Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Ramblings

There's a great kind of self awareness in these "hardcore" fans. They are aware of their low status on the cultural hierarchy which can be seen in their "shame" factor. Such as from my focus group, I asked what aspects of fandom they were ashamed of, there was a group consensus that the intensity and the extent of the fanaticism displayed at the time was generally not shared with their own friendship groups. Fan fiction in particular and how much time and effort devoted.

M: There are people out there that if I told them the level of obsession I have with something I would be judged so bad and I just, like, I don’t...

But they are also hyper aware of their power as a community. Fans of all ages, religions, genders, nationalities etc. across the globe collaborate online about fandom. They discuss ideas about the latest episode or a specific scene or the content of the next show; feelings and emotions uniformly or conflictingly felt when a major plot twist/event occurred such as the death of a beloved character, they give moral support when a fan explains they missed out on the latest episode or the panel meeting at a convention. When something happens in the plot of the film/television show is not well received by the fans, they will send angry messages to the producers and creators, even the actors of the franchise. When a film series or television series has come to an end, people will band together to campaign for a sequel (a prequel at most) or a new season.

They do this because it is known to work. It has happened before. The successful Doctor Who is what it is today because fans refused to let it be cancelled. Sherlock Holmes was resurrected by Arthur Conan Doyle after fans expressed outrage and dismay from his death in The Final Problem. That latter case occurred in the 1890s, so we can see how far fans have influenced the creating process. They know that without them, the fans, the show cannot go on. The show will fail. The production therefore needs to find a way to maintain the satisfaction and devotion from a fan base while taking the risks in how the show will turn out. When they get that balance then it is called good quality film/television. (Which is probably why I love Joss Whedon and Buffy so much....)

Throughout these ramblings I did not look anything up except for the dates when The Final Problem by Arthur Conan Doyle was published. All other references to pop culture and such I already know because of my own fandom activities. I go on tumblr as procrastination but also because I need my daily dose of it. There are fantastic images, gif sets, thoughts and ideas from other fans. I follow at least 4 Buffy/Joss Whedon blogs, 3 Avengers/Doctor Who/Supernatural/Sherlock blogs (those franchises are always together for some reason), 1 Disney blog and 1 Merlin blog. All of which I keep up to date, daily. I have never watched one episode of Doctor Who or have seen a full season of Supernatural, yet because the blogs I initially followed for Sherlock and Avengers were combined with these two, I learned the language and story arcs etc. just by observing.

It's all fun, a heart-warming and exciting and enjoyable.

Just thought it should be seen


In case you can't read that shoddy screen shot from a tumblr page:

Isn't it funny how must people don't know All The Things?
"They say things like, 'Oh is Sherlock doing another season?' and 'I heard it was coming back...sometime...' They ask things like 'Who's that guy in The Hobbit, he looks familiar...' and 'What kind of a name is Cumberbatch, anyway?'

They wonder about fannish movie trailers, when whatever trailer they're wondering about has been out for two weeks and has already been broken down frame by frame, turned into gif sets and generated four different memes.

They muse about possible storylines, when the episode synopses have been released for months and been endlessly analyzed, pontificated upon and worried over.

They don't know the names of the people playing the roles, when we have already viewed every single film in all of their backlists, know their birthday, where they're from and where they went to school and, of course, who they're dating. 

They don't know the dates episodes will air, when we know literally the second how long it will be until airtime.

Who are these people and why don't they know what we know?

Because we? We are fandom. AND THEY ARE NOT." 

Monday, July 9, 2012

Plan of PIP

Probably should have put this up earlier


  • Log: talk about the role of television and film in my life, myself as a fan, friends as fans, the day we went to JB-HI-FI and went through the whole television section and we didn't find one shelf that we couldn't talk about
  • Introduction: Investigating fandoms socialisation impact, particularly cyberfandom and how it blurs the lines of hyperreality and the "real" reality for a fan. Explain my research (primary and secondary). Cross cultural study is gender. Continuity of devotion and community but change in the process and outcome of fandom/ fan behaviour. 

  1. Chapter 1: “A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...”
  • Definition of fan and fandom
  • Tracing history of television and film fandom through studies of others
  • 3 generations of study as suggested by Betsy Gooch
  • Early fandom was unstructured small amount. Mainly male dominated. Lots of fanzines, physical fan clubs and some conventions. Memorabilia and fan letters. Restricted to maybe local interaction
  • Next generation gave way to even more fans, rise of female population in fan activity, more authority and power given to fans. Local - national interaction
  • Cyber fandom generation = explosion in numbers. Interactive globally. Cheaper, more accessible. More ways of participating in fandom. More ways to attract attention or to communicate with producers of television and film. Female dominated culture
     2.  Chapter 2: "Louise, I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship."
  • Explaining the separation of real life and fandom life. Low on cultural hierarchy, "shame" factor. Secret life/hobby
  • The appeal of fandom life. The community, sense of belonging, understanding and interaction between fans.
  • Fandom addiction. The lengths of devotion displayed by the average fan. Hours on the internet, ridiculous amounts of money for merchandise or tickets, tremendous expenses and time and effort watching, analysing and researching shows and films.
  • Fan activity. Fan fiction, fan art, fan videos, filk songs, costuming, conventions, interacting with other fans and producers. Creating and admiring and participation
     3.  Chapter 3: "Toto, I've a feeling we're not in Kansas any more."
    Jean Baudrillard meets Joss Whedon
  • Baudrillard's theory of hyperreality
  • How it applies to fandom today
  • Burring the lines between real life and hyperreality for fans
  • FIAWOL vs RL (Fandom Is A Way Of Life vs. Real Life) It's a lifestyle
  • C: Would you prefer real life or fandom online life?
    All [Unison]: Fandom life

    L: Real life sucks
  • It's a desired lifestyle. It becomes integrated into their lives in a major way. 
  • Impacts

  • Conclusion
  • (a hopefully) Kick-ass annotated bibliography


Mother fudger this is hard....